Wikipedia isn’t sure — and crypto bros are terrified......It's an "art emergency," apparently
NFT art has exploded in popularity, but it faces an uncertain future on Wikipedia. Editors of the online encyclopedia recently voted against categorizing non-fungible tokens as art. The result sparked fury in the crypto community.
The poll stemmed from discussions about Wikipedia’s list of the most expensive artworks by living artists, Cointelegraph reports.
The editors debated whether NFTs such as Murat Pak’s $91.8M The Merge and Beeple’s $69M Everydays should join the list. A majority of editors have voted against their inclusion.
While the result isn’t binding and involves a single Wikipedia page, the vote has caused consternation among NFT advocates.
Duncan Cock Foster, the cofounder of NFT marketplace Nifty Gateway, described the situation as an “art emergency.”
He warned that Wikipedia’s decision could deprive digital artists of their legitimacy:
"Wikipedia works off of precedent. If NFTs are classified as ‘not art’ on this page, then they will be classified as ‘not art’ on the rest of Wikipedia. Wikipedia is the global source of truth for many around the world. The stakes couldn’t be higher!"
The debate highlights the confusion surrounding NFT artworks.
While digital artists view NFTs as a medium for making and selling art, critics describe them as merely “financial instruments.”
The Wikipedia editors agreed that Beeple and Pak are artists. However, some argued that buying an NFT of an artwork isn’t the same as buying the artwork itself.
Another issue for Wikipedia involves the mechanisms of selling NFTs.
One editor said the sales of NFTs aren’t similar enough to other artwork sales to belong on the list.
As evidence, they pointed to doubts about the record sale of Pak’s The Merge. Critics have questioned claims that it’s the “largest-ever art sale by a living creator,” as the piece could be classified as a series of artworks.
The Wikipedia vote ultimately led to a new proposal from an editor: Beeple’s Everydays would retain its place, albeit with the addition of a note about the suspicions around the sale. Pak’s The Merge, however, would be excluded from the list:
"The only source I have found which states it should be considered a singular artwork sale is a Nifty Gateway press release, the vendor who facilitated the sale. This is a primary source: it is not sufficient to qualify the item for inclusion".
That’s not likely to impress Nifty Gateway, although it does leave the door open for a potential inclusion.
The discussions still require a consensus supported by Wikipedia policy, but they’ve already exposed the skepticism - and bewilderment - around the NFT art world.
TARANTINO’s NFTs
photo: Victoria Borodinova, pixabay
NFT beats cheugy to be Collins Dictionary’s word of the year
photo: @Grimezsz/Twitter
The abbreviation of ‘non-fungible token’ tops a shortlist also including pingdemic, climate anxiety and metaverse
In a year that has seen the musician Grimes sell a collection of digital artworks for almost $6m (£4.4m), and the original photo behind the 2005 Disaster Girl meme go for $473,000 (£354,000), Collins Dictionary has made NFT its word of the year.
Adidas has officially launched NFT collection
photo: © Adidas
Sports apparel company Adidas has officially launched Originals: Into the Metaverse, a non-fungible token (NFT) collection in partnership with NFT collections Bored Ape Yacht Club, PUNKS Comic, and crypto influencer gmoney. A total of almost 30,000 NFTs will go on sale at a fixed price, with 20,000 available for early access sales to owners of the partner collections.
Word of the Day: NFT
photo: Pixabay, BarbaraALane
NFT means non-fungible token. “Non-fungible” more or less means that it’s unique and can’t be replaced with something else. NFTs can be anything digital: drawings, music, your brain downloaded and turned into an AI). This tech is used to sell digital art. NFTs are designed to give you something that can’t be copied: ownership of the work (though the artist can still retain the copyright and reproduction rights, just like with physical artwork). To put it in terms of physical art collecting: anyone can buy a Monet print. But only one person can own the original.
Spotify disrupted due to NFT-based digital rights platform
photo: Pixabay, nickyandell72
Musicians are ready for change as the current music streaming paradigm means that labels and streaming platforms capture 75-95 percent of revenue paid for listening to streamed music. In 2022, new blockchain-based technology will help them grab back their fair share of industry revenues.